As we all know the theme behind the Chelsea Flower Show was to give solutions to save the green environment and with the variety of stunning gorgeous flowers along with their amazing scent that spread all over the air and the celebrations of the flower show really asking that question whether it’s a real celebration of nature or behind the glorious displays of flowers there is dark heart that remained unnoticed. Is the show ends up with being guilt of not providing the solution for safe environment or being a part of that environmental damage?

Along with all these question be remained fair to answer is that without damaging environment indirectly not any kind such big international flower show is possible and we are aware of it that the Australia Garden bought to show by bringing to the show two containers of stone and timber by sea and the six extra-large palm trees came from Spain through air and these flights emit 43 tons of CO2 that is nearly equal to yearly emission of CO2 in UK homes.

The energy that was wasted on organizing that show can be saved like Rueslyn Nurseries said that they had been lighting their nurseries since Christmas to get the early bloom for Chelsea and along with this all two industrial heaters were used to the maximum for weeks before the show and many use chillers in order to prevent plants flowering too early.

The theme of show demands to stop waste of lighting energy that was used during the show in day time as in the area of three acre Great Pavilion, which is naturally lit, had nearly all its internal floodlighting and external floodlighting on and about 50% of the open-air stalls along the main avenue also had their lights on this is failure of a show or success answer is up to you how you analyze it.